Category Archives: 17 Point Agreement

“China’s ‘Liberation’ of Tibet: Rules of the Game”

Robbie Barnett is on a roll, following up his bit yesterday with an article in the NYRoB about Xi Jinping in Lhasa. Some highlights:

Banners above the stage show that the speech was part of the ceremonies marking what China calls “the sixtieth anniversary of the liberation of Tibet,” a reference to China’s assumption of sovereignty over Tibet in 1951 following its invasion a year earlier. There are frequent shots of the audience in the square, which included, according to the official Chinese media, “more than 20,000 Tibetans of all walks of life.”

But the footage does not support this claim. For one thing, only two monks are shown among the 20,000 people in the audience—one of them is shown repeatedly—suggesting that Tibetans from a “walk of life” that is integral to Tibetan society were not invited. As for women, there are many in the audience, but among the 200 or so senior Chinese and Tibetan officials who are shown seated on the viewing platform, all but five are men.

Another detail stands out too: No one in the audience has a chair.

According to China Daily, Xi Jinping had brought with him 300,000 cold-proof stainless kettles, 710,000 stainless pressure cookers, 60,000 quilts, and 150 computers as gifts for the Tibetans. But, apparently, not chairs.

It must have been quite hot or tiring because some Tibetans in the square can be seen holding their heads in their hands and being comforted by other members of the audience. Occasionally one or two people get up and move, but for the most part, no one leaves his or her assigned spot. At the back of the crowd one can even see synchronized displays—words spelled out by rows of people holding up different characters that form huge slogans saying “We thank the Chinese People” and “Tibet’s Future Will be Better.” One could be forgiven at times for thinking that Lhasa had been taken over not by Beijing but by Pyongyang.

After the ceremony in 2005, we were all allowed out on the streets once the formal events had ended, and so I went to the Post Office, near the exit of the square, and joined a vast crowd of curious Tibetans to watch the participants as they left. But what we saw coming out of the square had not been visible on the television screen: hundreds of armed troops followed by armored personnel carriers, riot control vehicles, water-cannon trucks, barbed-wire laying machines, vehicles with gun turrets and other forms of military hardware.

The military vehicles and the troops were not visible in the footage of the ceremony this year either, but they were surely there again. Perhaps there is an underlying view that all Tibetans are rebels thirsting for a war. If so, it would explain why the head of China’s army had been sent to sit next to Xi Jinping on the stage during the ceremony. It would also explain why there were no chairs: presumably they are seen as potential weapons in the hands of imagined Tibetan rioters, more threatening than plastic stools.

Everyone can understand why China is proud of improving Tibetan infrastructure and wants to maintain its rule over Tibet, but it is not clear why its leaders, or even ordinary Chinese, expect forcing Tibetans to stage rituals of mass gratitude to Xi Jinping and the Chinese government not to fuel resentment. In any event, resentment seems to be spreading among Tibetans: last week on August 15 another Tibetan burnt himself to death, others say they have been tortured after staging minor protests, at least three of the 13 Tibetan areas in China remain closed to foreigners, and the state’s officially selected Panchen Lama cannot visit a monastery without a major security operation to prevent unrest.

Leave a comment

Filed under 17 Point Agreement, propaganda, Tibet

“Official celebrations marking the 60th anniversary of the “Peaceful Liberation of Tibet”: attendees and absentees”

The International Campaign for Tibet has an update about the recent anniversary of the signing of the 17 Point Agreement- Beijing threw several celebrations, which is odd considering the distance between the promises made in the Agreement and the reality of how Beijing has ruled Tibet since then.  Anyway, most interesting is speculation about the future of Zhang Qingli, the Party Secretary of Tibet (therefore, the most powerful politician in the province).  As they say:

Speculation about Zhang Qingli’s future in the TAR has remained intense since the unprecedented protests of March 2008. His open hostility towards the Dalai Lama and his determination to push through deeply unpopular security and social policies are regarded by many Tibetans and other observers as key causes of the resentment that led to the protests of 2008. Compared to his predecessors in the position of Party Secretary of the TAR, Zhang Qingli has appeared relatively frequently in the national and international media, repeatedly asserting the official line that the 2008 protests were instigated by the Dalai Lama and his supporters, and that the vast majority of Tibetans continue to readily embrace China’s policies.

However, Zhang’s dogmatic adherence to the official line may have caused some embarrassment for Beijing. For instance, the tone and nature of his attacks on the “Dalai Lama clique” during the Olympic Torch relay ceremony in Lhasa in June 2008 brought a rare rebuke from the International Olympic Committee, which said in a statement that it “regrets that political statements were made during the closing ceremony of the torch relay in Tibet.”  Tibetan bloggers, usually extremely careful in their use of language, were unusually critical of Zhang’s comments. One writer, in a November 2008 posting entitled “The Stupid Zhang Qingli,” wrote that “Turning the Lhasa Olympic torch relay ceremony into a ‘struggle session’ against the Dalai Lama not only made [Zhang Qingli] lose his own personal demeanor, it was also seriously damaging to the state’s Tibet policies and the state’s image in the world over its treatment of ethnic minorities.”

More recently, Zhang Qingli’s assertions that the TAR would be closed to foreign tourists during the March 14 anniversary of the 2008 protests over “safety concerns” due to cold weather and a lack of available hotel rooms were met with considerable incredulity.

I had forgotten about that last one:  Tibet was closed to foreigners in March because of cold weather.  If your excuse is going to be that lame, why are you even coming up with one?!  Just say it’s closed and that’s that.  Honestly, the goofiness of the propaganda machines sometimes…

Leave a comment

Filed under 17 Point Agreement, China, Communist Party, Tibet